Vote: New rule proposal

A short discussion took place with some members of the administration today, And a new rule was proposed. The rule was as following:

PROPOSED VERSION:
- All factions need at least a Level 3+ Administrator's permission to make faction alliances.

However after some thought, I myself believed this rule to be too strict. Which is why, I've decided to ask you. The general playing community. On your thoughts regarding this rule. The rule was proposed in the hopes of stopping un-realistic alliances. Such as: Families allied with Ballas, Aztecas allied with Vagos etc. And also to stop certain belligerent faction leader's from acquiring too many allies to gang up on on a loner faction.

I myself, Recently thought up an alternative to the above rule, As is follows:

MY VERSION:
- All factions can have a maximum of at least 3 alliances at any given time.

What do you, The general community public think? Let us know your opinions/thoughts down below. Make sure to vote as well.

I like the three allies rule. Either that, or revoke that shit entirely.

Three allies rule, NO gang can have so many allies.
NOW that's Impossible.

So all the factions can be allies and team up against one faction is okay?
That happened to me once

Well depends on what you vote.

Smokey wrote:

So all the factions can be allies and team up against one faction is okay?
That happened to me once

IC'ly, yeah. I don't see why not? If you fuck with everyone, expect to be fucked with lol.

But seriously i think Ballas and Families should never be Allies don't you think so?

I don't think so, vote what you'd like.
It wouldn't be realistic to restrict a Families and Ballas alliance.

Smokey wrote:

But seriously i think Ballas and Families should never be Allies don't you think so?

I kinda agree tbh, but it shouldn't be 100% impossible. What if TDF splits and allies with RHB or FYB?

Can we quit the over-posting so some new guys can leave their opinions? Thank you. *Cleans up topic*

I'll just set the record straight here.

Code:

- We do not have to follow the Single Player story which means, "Leader" or "Special" character's can be subjected to change name if the owner of that class so desires. Families can also deal drugs etc (Leaders decide how they want their members to act).

That means if you are granted rights to say for example: OG Loc's skin, You don't have to be OG Loc if you don't want to. You can be your own unique character and i will change the character's name in the class selection screen to adapt to that. Of course, If you want to role play as a character from the Single Player story, You have complete control to do so as well. If you are the leader of a faction, And you want that faction to act as you want them to, Or like they would in single player. By all means, Go ahead.

That's what that rule means in a nutshell.

Max. of 3 Alliances.

You gotta be kidding me-.-
Just let it be as it is just remove that families can be allied with ballas, vla with vagos eg.
admins should not involve themselves in an ic matter.
and the only 3 allies is bad, we the triads would have it better with more allies, = earn more money

Explain why Peanutt, that's just bad since admins should not even care about what's going on IC, it's just stupid and this is not no fucking north korea

sols is enough for me, i don't want wcl to turn out like that too-.-

Yeah me either,Siv commands on SOLS about allies,we really just could have 3 max allies,i mean Siv is not problem.

WCL-Marcus wrote:

Yeah me either,Siv commands on SOLS about allies,we really just could have 3 max allies,i mean Siv is not problem.

What are you talking about?

nvm

Agree with max 3 allies

Just make it where Ballas and Families cant be allies

I have an Idea about Part-Time allies, but that's something totally diffferent.
I voted for Lvl3+ admins to be involved because if everyone have 3 allies, it's gonna' be Mega Ultra Super Duper Gang Wars.

All factions need at least a Level 3+ Administrator's permission to make faction alliances.

admins do not have to care about who allies with who, but i as the faction moderator would/will and ask suggestions from other admins if needed. i think having only 3 allies is not really good as jamal said, it's not just because of us, it's that triads don't only have 3 allies. they have connections everywhere and such. and even with those 3 allies they can make an alliance with someone who shouldn't be. like the biggest and most active faction becomes allies with the other two biggest and most active factions?

just cut it

ballas - families can not be under an alliance
vagos - varios los aztecas can not be under an alliance
rest can be allied, simple as it?

let us be free like we are now, else the game gets just more and more boring, we're here for fun.

From what the poll says, 3-4 allies are liked the most.
I think that really is a good idea, I mean I understand you guys would like more then 3 or 4 allies, but, this is better, so people will THINK MORE about who's neutral, who's an enemy. 'Cause everything I see is, JUST 'CAUSE someone says shit about another ally IC, "FYB is enemies" etc. People must think about who they are cool with.